Higgs Hunters Talk

How can we know if we're performing the task well?

  • ahooper1 by ahooper1

    I'd not like to be doing hundreds of images and missing many that should be marked or marking many that aren't useful!

    Posted

  • Whoandwhatitis by Whoandwhatitis moderator in response to ahooper1's comment.

    The FAQ and tutorial are currently the best resources for this project. I understand that the tutorial will be expanded and the FAQ is being updated frequently.

    The inability to clearly see your individual impact and verify your classifications is a behavior that I see across the Zooniverse. From what I've read, there seems to be some great reasons for the abstraction of this information from the user interface. The reasons and level of abstraction will of course vary between projects, but I think the overall goal is to obtain statistically significant amounts of classifications without providing sources that can bias observations. This I think is the embodiment of citizen science.

    The best overview I can find to support this is on the Zooniverse > About Us > Researchers menu item: https://www.zooniverse.org/researchers

    Here are some resources that I've "followed" in this project. These may help a bit:

    1. Useful quotes from the Talk
      boards
    2. What would be "something weird"?
    3. Lots of Energy, but no particles
    4. What are we seeing?
    5. 'Muon jet' follow up

    Posted

  • DZM by DZM admin

    Hi @ahooper, welcome to the project! Yes, the links that @Whoandwhatitis provided are extremely useful; please read through them.

    In addition, I would advise that you not worry too much about how well you're doing. Citizen science supports educated guessing! Many people see each object, and we combine and reduce their classifications to produce what tends to be the same answer a trained scientist would give. And if the classifications are all over the place, that tells us it's a tough one that a scientist should look at... so no matter what, you're helping. 😃

    Thanks for being a part of the project!

    Posted

  • jokergirl by jokergirl moderator in response to Whoandwhatitis's comment.

    I like this list. I would like to add those links to my FAQ post, with your permission.

    Posted

  • DZM by DZM admin

    Please do! I'm still trying to work on getting that FAQ button on the classification interface.

    Posted

  • Mark_..._a_physicist_of_sorts by Mark_..._a_physicist_of_sorts

    I appreciate this is how Citizen Science works (and statistically you're doubtless bang on) but it is human to want feedback and it would be SO nice (even if it was just on the sim data) to get a 'tick' if we're correct!

    Posted

  • DZM by DZM admin

    I think that would have had to have been built in at the beginning of the project, unfortunately.

    It's definitely a good thing to keep in mind as we go forward!!

    Posted

  • Whoandwhatitis by Whoandwhatitis moderator in response to jokergirl's comment.

    Absolutely, @jokergirl. You're doing a fantastic job with the FAQ! I especially like that there's an advanced section that provides some handy tips, but isn't really "required reading" in order to be involved in the project.

    Posted

  • DZM by DZM admin

    I absolutely agree. The FAQ is brilliant and I think will be a mandatory implementation on all new projects going forward!

    Posted